Explaining the Democratic Anchorage of Governance Networks
نویسندگان
چکیده
Advances in understanding the democratic anchorage of governance networks require carefully designed and contextually grounded empirical analysis that take into account contextual factors. The article uses a conjectural framework to study the impact of the national democratic milieu on the relationship between network governance and representative institutions in four European countries: the United Kingdom, Switzerland, the Netherlands, and Denmark. The article shows that the distinction between majoritarian and consensus democracy as well as the varying strength of voluntary associations are important contextual factors that help explain cross-national differences in the relationship between governance networks and representative institutions. We conclude that a context of weak associationalism in majoritarian democracies facilitates the instrumentalization of networks by government actors (United Kingdom), whereas a more complementary role of governance networks prevails in consensus democracies (Switzerland). However, in consensus democracies characterized by a context of strong associationalism (the Netherlands and Denmark), the spread of governance networks in public policy making is likely to lead to more substantial transformations of the democratic processes. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/ATP1084-1806330100 Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-56043 Published Version Originally published at: Skelcher, C; Klijn, E H; Kübler, D; Sorensen, E; Sullivan, H (2011). Explaining the Democratic Anchorage of Governance Networks. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 33(1):7-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/ATP1084-1806330100 Explaining the Democratic Anchorage of Governance Networks Evidence from Four European Countries Chris Skelcher University of Birmingham Erik-Hans Klijn Erasmus University Rotterdam Daniel Kübler University of Zurich Eva Sørensen Roskilde University Helen Sullivan University of Birmingham
منابع مشابه
Accountable Climate Governance: Dilemmas of Performance Management across Complex Governance Networks
How can accountability be institutionalized across complex governance networks that are dealing with the transboundary pollution problem of mitigating greenhouse gas emissions at multiple spatial, temporal and social scales? To address this question, we propose an accountability framework that enables comparison of the democratic, market and administrative anchorage of actor accountability with...
متن کاملThe Authoritative Governance in the Middle East And the Process of “Transition to Democracy”
Duringpast two decades, “Pass through a democratic status” gave attention by mostMiddle East analysts. In fact, since the early 1980s, The Middle East and TheNorth of Africa affected by third wave of democratization effects and bothstate and society felt its impacts. Since, civil society has been promoting andstrengthening, from one hand, and sovereign governments gradually withdrawalhas begun,...
متن کاملPolycentrism in Global Health Governance Scholarship; Comment on “Four Challenges That Global Health Networks Face”
Drawing on an in-depth analysis of eight global health networks, a recent essay in this journal argued that global health networks face four challenges to their effectiveness: problem definition, positioning, coalition-building, and governance. While sharing the argument of the essay concerned, in this commentary, we argue that these analytical concepts can be used to explicate a concept that h...
متن کاملThe Effect of Corporate Governance Mechanisms on Audit Quality by Explaining the Intermediary Function of Auditor's Behavioral Components
The purpose of this study was to investigate the structural pattern of the effect of corporate governance mechanisms (internal organization) on audit quality considering the role of the intermediary variable of behavioural components of auditors. The statistical population of this research is independent auditors and auditors working in audit firms. A sample of 395 people was selected by simple...
متن کاملSelf-Organized Governance Networks for Ecosystem Management: Who Is Accountable?
Governance networks play an increasingly important role in ecosystem management. The collaboration within these governance networks can be formalized or informal, top-down or bottom-up, and designed or self-organized. Informal self-organized governance networks may increase legitimacy if a variety of stakeholders are involved, but at the same time, accountability becomes blurred when decisions ...
متن کامل